Policies

Plagiarism and similarity

Similarity checks and how plagiarism is handled.

  • Aligned with COPE Core Practices
  • 2 min read
On this page

At a glance

  • Every manuscript is checked for similarity before review and before publication.
  • The editor judges the overlap itself, not only the percentage.
  • Self-plagiarism and duplicate publication count as plagiarism.

Plagiarism is the use of another person's words, ideas, data, images or results without proper acknowledgement. Journal of Education Development & Technology Research does not tolerate plagiarism in any form and checks every manuscript for it.

How manuscripts are checked

  1. Every submission is checked with similarity-detection software against published literature, the web and other submissions before peer review.
  2. The editor reads the similarity report. The overall percentage is a guide only: what matters is where the overlap is and whether it is properly quoted and cited.
  3. Accepted manuscripts are checked again before publication.

What counts as plagiarism

  • Copying text, figures, tables or data from another source without quotation marks and citation.
  • Paraphrasing another work closely without acknowledging it.
  • Translating another author's work into another language and presenting it as original.
  • Self-plagiarism: reusing substantial parts of the authors' own published work without citation, including publishing the same results twice (duplicate or redundant publication) or splitting one study into several articles (salami slicing).
  • Using text or images produced by generative tools that reproduce others' work without attribution.

What happens when it is found

  • Before publication: depending on the extent, the authors are asked to rewrite and cite properly, or the manuscript is declined. Serious cases may be reported to the authors' institution.
  • After publication: the case is handled under the corrections and retractions policy and may lead to a correction or retraction.
  • All cases follow the relevant COPE flowchart and the authors are given the chance to respond.

Methods sections and standard phrases naturally overlap with earlier work. Reusing a short description of one's own method is acceptable when the earlier paper is cited.

Official references

This policy follows these published standards and guidelines. Each link opens the original source.